home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Aminet 23
/
Aminet 23 (1998)(GTI - Schatztruhe)[!][Feb 1998].iso
/
Aminet
/
dev
/
amos
/
AMOS1097.lzh
/
AMOSLIST
/
000010_amos-request@svcs1.digex.net_Wed Oct 1 21:51:14 1997.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1997-11-02
|
3KB
Received: from svcs1.digex.net (svcs1.digex.net [204.91.197.224])
by mail2.access.digex.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA06241
for <mcox@access.digex.net>; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 21:51:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by svcs1.digex.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA10112
for amos-out; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 19:25:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail3.access.digex.net (mail3.access.digex.net [205.197.247.4])
by svcs1.digex.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA10109
for <amos-list@svcs1.digex.net>; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 19:25:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from punt-1.mail.demon.net (punt-1a.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.134])
by mail3.access.digex.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA04708
for <amos-list@access.digex.net>; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 19:25:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from agasinc.demon.co.uk ([193.237.4.98]) by punt-1.mail.demon.net
id ad1412821; 1 Oct 97 23:57 BST
From: Andy Gibson <andy@agasinc.demon.co.uk>
To: Alastair Murray <malcolm.murray@virgin.net>
CC: Amos List <amos-list@access.digex.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 23:49:24 -0000
Message-ID: <yam7212.1226.3160680@post.demon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <3432802C.MD-0.196.malcolm.murray@virgin.net>
X-Mailer: YAM 1.3.4 [020] - Amiga Mailer by Marcel Beck
Organization: AGAS Productions
Subject: Re: GUI Ext
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by svcs1.digex.net id TAA10110
Status: O
X-Status:
On 01-Oct-97, Alastair Murray wrote:
(Andy Gibson and GUI)
>I think that's a bit mixed up.
>AMOS is perfectly fine for WB apps with the GUI extension. (unless of
>course you were writing something like a raytracer which needs optimal
>speed).
>Most people actual say the complete opposite, that it is too slow for
>games.
OK I give in! hands up `n' all that...
It's just that I used InTOS before and it was very very slow.
(Although, this was a pre-release version sent to me as being the
Amoszine Editor ya see). Anyway, I thought it was Amos that was slow,
but I guess it was just IntOS all the time :)
Has anyone tried the Amos OSDev Kit? It was on 3 disks I think and
cost about �30! I never got round to tring it properly, but I believe
it was supposed to be good and WB applications.
--
_ _ _ _
_)\ ____)\ _)\ _____)\ #cONTACT mE fOR mORE iNFO#
/o� \ /o�____) /o� \ /o�_____) #oN aREA51 rELEASES aLSO.#
// \ // / __ // \\\ \____
/. O \ /. /___\ \ /. O \\____ \ *andy@agasinc.demon.co.uk*
/ _ \/ Y Y \/ _ \ ___\\ \
\ __/ \___/\_________ /\___/ \ __//______/ Team *AMOS*
Y Y Y Y
L8R : � � #cOMING sOON'ish#
. Andy Gibson (AGAS Productons) *Roswell Gfx Adv*
� -=<(aka SKiDZ/A51)>=- 9T7